Introduction: A Toyota bushing part number becomes useful when it is read alongside suspension position, vehicle details, and the physical dimensions of the part.
A parts catalog often begins with a number because numbers are easier to store, search, and compare than long product descriptions. The difficulty comes when that number is asked to carry too much meaning. A number can identify a product record, but fitment depends on several connected layers. A catalog researcher first needs to identify the component and its installation position. The next step is to place it within the correct vehicle year and configuration. Physical dimensions and supporting records then complete the identification. Reading the information in this order prevents a plausible match from being presented as a precise one.
The first task is to connect the Toyota bushing part number to a named component. In the current example, `48815-06190` is presented as an OEM part number for a front stabilizer bar bushing. The same product record also uses `LLK-0182` as its product number. For identification purposes, the useful starting point is therefore a three-part description: `48815-06190`, front stabilizer bar bushing, Toyota suspension system. Each part of that description answers a different question. The number locates the product record. The component name separates the item from control arm bushings, shock absorber components, engine mounts, and other rubber parts that may appear in a broad Toyota catalog. The word “front” establishes the installation position. The suspension-system classification places the bushing in the correct vehicle system. Position matters because suspension parts work within a connected mechanical arrangement. As the overview from How a Car Works explains, a vehicle suspension manages wheel movement through components arranged around the wheel and chassis. A bushing identified only as “Toyota rubber bushing” loses that structural relationship. “Front stabilizer bar bushing” gives a catalog user a much clearer picture of the part and the assembly to which it belongs. This sequence is especially useful when several records contain similar names. A researcher may find the number first in a spreadsheet, the product name in a supplier listing, and the installation position in a separate catalog field. Bringing those fields together establishes product identity before vehicle fitment is considered. It also keeps front and rear components from being grouped merely because they share a general shape or product family. The number should therefore be used as an anchor, not as the entire fitment description. At this stage, the catalog can confidently identify the item as a Toyota front stabilizer bar bushing associated with `48815-06190` and product number `LLK-0182`. Vehicle configuration and physical matching belong to the next layers.
Once the component has been identified, the next question is which vehicle record belongs with it. Toyota Camry 2004-2005 is the available vehicle clue for this bushing. That information narrows the search from the entire Toyota range to a named model and two model years. It is valuable catalog data, but it represents the vehicle-identification layer rather than every possible fitment detail. A model name can continue across multiple years while the parts used within that model change. Even within the same year, vehicle configuration and market version can affect the suspension components assigned to a catalog entry. This is why a researcher should connect the model-year clue to a more detailed vehicle record instead of turning “Toyota Camry 2004-2005” into a blanket statement covering every version. The practical issue often appears during catalog maintenance. One source may contain `48815-06190`, another may say “Camry 2004-2005,” and an older internal record may contain only “Toyota front bushing. ” These entries look related, but they operate at different levels. The number and component name identify the product. The model and year identify a vehicle range. Configuration data then determines how narrowly that range can be described. For this example, body style, engine, drive type, market version, and model code remain fields to establish through supporting vehicle records. They should remain unfilled rather than being completed with assumptions from another Camry listing. This approach protects the usefulness of the catalog: an empty field clearly signals the next research need, while an assumed value can create a false sense of precision. Fitment wording also needs to match the depth of the underlying information. The FTC’s advertising guidance explains that objective product representations require appropriate support. In catalog terms, a broad compatibility statement needs broader vehicle data than a limited model-year reference. “Toyota Camry 2004-2005 fitment reference” accurately reflects the available information. A statement covering every configuration would require configuration-level records.
Vehicle data brings the record closer to a usable fitment description, but a stabilizer bar bushing is also a physical interface. Its opening must correspond to the bar, while its exterior form must sit correctly within the surrounding mounting arrangement. This final stage connects the catalog identity to the actual component geometry. The current product information does not specify the inner diameter, outer diameter, width, matching stabilizer bar diameter, model code, or cross-reference number. Those fields are best understood by the separate questions they answer:
These four information types are related, but they are not interchangeable. A cross-reference can connect numbers without supplying dimensions. A drawing can define dimensions without identifying every vehicle configuration. A sample can support a physical comparison without explaining the history of an OEM number. A well-maintained catalog preserves these distinctions and combines the records only where their information agrees. The resulting identification path is simple: establish the product through its number, category, system, and position; narrow the vehicle through model, year, and configuration; then compare the bushing and stabilizer bar dimensions with supporting records. This order gives each field a clear job and keeps the final fitment description tied to the information actually available.
Toyota bushing identification works best as a progression rather than a single-number lookup. For `48815-06190`, the solid starting point is a Toyota suspension component identified as a front stabilizer bar bushing, with `LLK-0182` as the associated product number and Toyota Camry 2004-2005 as the vehicle clue. Configuration details, stabilizer bar size, product dimensions, and cross-reference records complete the later stages. Reading the fields in that order produces clearer catalog entries and makes missing information easy to locate without filling gaps with assumptions.
Q：What information should be read with a Toyota bushing part number?
A：Read the part number with the component name, suspension system, front or rear installation position, vehicle model and year, configuration details, stabilizer bar size, product dimensions, and documented cross-references. These fields move the record from basic product identity to a specific physical and vehicle application.
Q：Does Toyota Camry 2004-2005 confirm every vehicle configuration?
A：No. Toyota Camry 2004-2005 identifies the available model-year range for this example. Configuration and market details still need their own supporting vehicle records before the catalog entry is extended to every version within those years.
Q：Why do bushing dimensions matter after the part number is found?
A：Dimensions connect the catalog record to the physical part. Inner diameter relates to the stabilizer bar interface, while outer dimensions and width help distinguish the bushing body and mounting form. They are particularly useful when several bushings have similar names or appearances.
OEM 48815-06190 Front Stabilizer Bar Bushing for Toyota Camry 2004-2005
